You’ve got $50 billion for transit. Now how should you spend it? [View all]
from the Transport Politic:
[font size="1"]
» Metropolitan Seattle plans to offer its voters the chance to fund a large new transit expansion program. But are the projects chosen for initial funding the right ones?[/font]
Building a regional fixed-guideway transit network is no quick or easy feat, at least in the United States in our era of high costs and relatively slow construction timelines. Seattles first light rail line was funded by voters in 1996 but didnt open its first section for thirteen years; the full extent of the initial line just opened last month, a full twenty years later.
Despite the slow pace, residents of big cities across the country are hungry for more, hoping to spread the benefits of rapid transit to other parts of their respective metropolitan areas. That impulse motivated Seattle residents to approve the $18 billion Sound Transit 2 package (named after the regional transit agency) in 2008, which will extend Link light rail north, south, and east, creating a 50-mile light rail network by 2023.
It has also encouraged Sound Transit to propose a third package of projects, expected to be submitted for voter approval this November. Sound Transit 3 (ST3) would support $50 billion in investments, to be completed by 2041.
Excitement about adding light railand the region does apparently want it, given the massive ridership produced by the opening of new stations last monthhas nevertheless been countered by skepticism about the value of the draft ST3 plan put forward by the transit agencys planners and leaders.
Their questions are relevant to any region thats considering major new transit expansion projects: If the projects the plan includes arent ideal, are they worth paying for? If the projects are built in the wrong order, are the links scheduled for the back of the line worth waiting for? ..............(more)
http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2016/04/06/youve-got-50-billion-for-transit-now-how-should-you-spend-it/