Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moniss

(6,209 posts)
4. It is reasonable to conclude that there
Fri Jan 3, 2025, 02:29 AM
Friday

is more with Thomas that has not been found out yet. It may not be in the form of direct gifts but it may involve communications with parties affiliated with others with cases before the SC. There may be promises or "asks" for future gifts, compensation, provision of things for others etc. in return for rulings.

The rot with "Cash and Carry" Clarence isn't just for his vote in a case but it is also about his lobbying the other justices to "see things" his way that is suspect. The rot also extends into those who clerk for him because it instills in them the manner and methods of successfully engaging in this kind of conduct.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US Supreme Court's Thomas...»Reply #4