US Supreme Court's Thomas will not be referred to Justice Department, judiciary says

[mahatmakanejeeves]

Source: Reuters, via Yahoo!

Reuters
US Supreme Court's Thomas will not be referred to Justice Department, judiciary says

Nate Raymond
Thu, January 2, 2025 at 6:11 PM EST
2 min read

By Nate Raymond

(Reuters) -A judicial policymaking body on Thursday rejected a request by Democratic lawmakers to refer conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to the Department of Justice to examine claims that he failed to disclose gifts and travel provided by a wealthy benefactor.

The secretary to the U.S. Judicial Conference, the federal judiciary's top policymaking body, in a pair of letters, cited amendments Thomas had made to his annual financial disclosure reports that addressed several issues raised by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Hank Johnson.

It also in a separate letter declined to refer liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Justice Department based on claims by a conservative group that she failed to disclose the source of her husband’s consulting income. Jackson has since amended her disclosures, the letter noted.

The Democratic lawmakers had made their request in an April 2023 letter following reports by ProPublica and others that Thomas, a member of the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority, had not reported gifts including luxury travel from wealthy Texas businessman and Republican donor Harlan Crow.

{snip}

Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-supreme-courts-thomas-not-231126068.html

[underpants]

1. Jesus, talk about a just occupying a space for no reason.

A complete POS - that’s military and work experience speaking.

[jimfields33]

3. Both justices cases not going through.

Thomas probably should have at least to see what else that we are unaware of.

[BumRushDaShow]

2. Link to Judicial Conference letter

https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/zgvoaerlwvd/Whitehouse%20Letter_1.2.25.pdf

[moniss]

4. It is reasonable to conclude that there

is more with Thomas that has not been found out yet. It may not be in the form of direct gifts but it may involve communications with parties affiliated with others with cases before the SC. There may be promises or "asks" for future gifts, compensation, provision of things for others etc. in return for rulings.

The rot with "Cash and Carry" Clarence isn't just for his vote in a case but it is also about his lobbying the other justices to "see things" his way that is suspect. The rot also extends into those who clerk for him because it instills in them the manner and methods of successfully engaging in this kind of conduct.

[republianmushroom]

5. Our "Supreme Court Justice" being protected.

Another one of those above the law.

[LudwigPastorius]

6. So, if one were to file a fraudulent tax return, and get caught,...

all they'd have to do would be to make an "amendment" and the feds would say it's all good?

Riiiight