Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 93 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BWAHAHAHA Krasnov Doesn't...»Reply #18
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: BWAHAHAHA Krasnov Doesn't Get Aileen Cannon To Hear His WSJ Lawsuit [View all]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
BWAHAHAHA Krasnov Doesn't Get Aileen Cannon To Hear His WSJ Lawsuit [View all] gab13by13 Tuesday OP
Finally! Something random in the judicial system breaking our way. hatrack Tuesday #1
Expecting all out attack on the judge's family Walleye Tuesday #2
The serious side to this... Hugin Tuesday #5
Krassenuff's judicial forum-shopping psychosis is disgusting. I am glad this one backfired on him. John1956PA Tuesday #3
Forum-shopping is an abomination. Mr. Joe Steel Tuesday #11
Judges' personalities were never supposed to influence decisions DeeDeeNY Tuesday #22
"Unfair!" "Fake news!" "Why are you all turning against me!" Hugin Tuesday #4
And it echoed throughout maga-manland (R): "unfair, unfair, waah, unfair." BoRaGard Tuesday #7
How did you get 50:50 odds? The source actually says it was unlikely that Cannon would get the case. sl8 Tuesday #6
Yeah a drawback to my getting a lot of my news listening to it, gab13by13 Tuesday #9
OK. sl8 Tuesday #10
Thanks for the link. And per Google AI, it's an automated randomization process, TheRickles Tuesday #14
Timing by Trump's lawyers gab13by13 Tuesday #16
I remember this and it got little coverage, gab13by13 Tuesday #15
Here's a blurb from The Hill about how/why Cannon was assigned to the documents case: sl8 Tuesday #19
Thank you! I've been wondering about this for a long time. :-( TheRickles Tuesday #24
Here is the caveat of the SDFL BumRushDaShow Tuesday #21
Good malaise Tuesday #8
Oh dear, gab13by13 Tuesday #12
Trump's lawyers filed the case in the Miami Division, not Fort Pierce. onenote Tuesday #13
Thank you, fixed. gab13by13 Tuesday #17
"He was allowed to file his documents case in Fort Pierce where he also had better odds." BumRushDaShow Tuesday #23
This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Tuesday #27
It's both complicated and simple. onenote Tuesday #28
SC Justice? MaineNative Tuesday #18
Knr UTUSN Tuesday #20
I was listening to Legal AF last night peggysue2 Tuesday #25
The case was filed in the Miami division; Cannon is in the Fort Pierce division. Ocelot II Tuesday #26
Can he withdraw the case and resubmit it hoping to get lucky? live love laugh Tuesday #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BWAHAHAHA Krasnov Doesn't...»Reply #18
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2025 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.