Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Liberal YouTubers

Bluethroughu

(6,532 posts)

4. CO courts and the Supreme Court did not over-rule

Reply to qazplm135 (Reply #2)

Mon Dec 30, 2024, 11:51 PM

Dec 30

He was an insurrectionist, they just allowed him to be on the ballot, because 1 state, SCOTUS said, could not interfere with who was on the ballot of a federal election...

Constitution does not even say that, but that is what they ruled on.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

tintinvotes yellow dahlia

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Will any Dems OBJECT to Trump under ELECTORAL COUNT ACT? - Meidas Touch [View all] Rhiannon12866 Dec 30 OP

Have any even hinted at doing that? Silent Type Dec 30 #1

I think... 2naSalit Dec 31 #8

He wasn't convicted of insurrection qazplm135 Dec 30 #2

CO courts and the Supreme Court did not over-rule Bluethroughu Dec 30 #4

Just because a civil entity qazplm135 Dec 30 #5

Why tintinvotes Dec 31 #7

There's nothing in there qazplm135 Dec 31 #9

? tintinvotes Dec 31 #11

Good grief qazplm135 Dec 31 #15

Inciting an insurrection makes him an insurrectionist. Bluethroughu Dec 31 #14

Colorado tintinvotes Dec 31 #6

And you really think qazplm135 Dec 31 #10

Tx? tintinvotes Dec 31 #12

Actually tintinvotes Dec 31 #13

I hope every member in Congress rejects this Bluethroughu Dec 30 #3