Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cannabis

still_one

(97,078 posts)

6. I voted no on 61 because it has unintended consequences. It only covers about 12% of

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Sun Oct 30, 2016, 10:42 PM

Oct 2016

Californians, and it could actually disrupts access to needed medications, along with an increase in prices.

I voted for proposition 64 though, but not because I smoke it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Anyone catch 60 Minutes cannabis hit piece tonight? [View all] SHRED Oct 2016 OP

I bet over 50 percent of ca mail in is already done MattP Oct 2016 #2

Yes I did. It appeared to convey the opinion of the cops, and the Gov. who never wanted napi21 Oct 2016 #4

Yes SHRED Oct 2016 #5

I voted no on 61 because it has unintended consequences. It only covers about 12% of still_one Oct 2016 #6

YES! It was definitely a sh**load of propaganda. Women shouldn't drink, smoke or take any skylucy Oct 2016 #7

Yes, what crap.. mountain grammy Oct 2016 #8

The doctor was smirking SHRED Oct 2016 #9

That was pretty much my take on it. mountain grammy Oct 2016 #11

I think, at this point, whatever audience 60 minutes has skews REALLY older. Warren DeMontague Oct 2016 #10

MSM is behind the curve. CanSocDem Nov 2016 #13

drug dealers don't want it legalized zippythepinhead Dec 2016 #13

Dec 1969 #