Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cannabis

RussBLib

(9,769 posts)

8. I would have voted "yes"

Reply to n2doc (Original post)

Thu Nov 5, 2015, 08:11 AM

Nov 2015

...and then worked to overturn the rule setting aside only 10 companies to grow it. That could probably have been challenged and overturned in the courts.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ohio votes against Pot Monopoly [View all] n2doc Nov 2015 OP

Not being from Ohio, I am confused. enough Nov 2015 #1

The bigger issue was how this was to be done n2doc Nov 2015 #2

This was a vote against the idea that social justice has to be bought by reducing economic justice. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #3

Nick Lachey (of the boy band 98 Degrees) stood to make big money underpants Nov 2015 #4

I think it's a slightly different usage of 'monopoly' here. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #5

Defeat of MJ Legalization in OH Says A Lot About the Kind of Economy People Are Sick and Tired Of eridani Nov 2015 #6

Statement from Mason Tvert, director of communications for the Marijuana Policy Project eridani Nov 2015 #7

I would have voted "yes" RussBLib Nov 2015 #8