Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: We need to avoid going third party. Thinking that a third party would have more leverage [View all]ieoeja
(9,748 posts)35. You're late.
The Reform Party made a big splash in 1992. In fact, its presidential candidate, Ross Perot, outpolled both Clinton and Bush just prior to the election. In a 1-900 pool. Making it the #1 party among people stupid enough to pay for a meaningless vote.
By 1998 it was the third largest political party in the United States. It was always a rightwing, populist party. In fact, rank-and-file Teabaggers would have fit the 90's Reform Party to a tee. It is at the leadership level that the Tea Party swings wildly away from populist to the point of making the rank-and-file look like deluded idiots.
Hard rightwingers led by Pat Buchanan then took over the party causing it to fracture. This was made easy for the Right because the Reform Party used a national caucus
Ultimately, the hard right abandoned the party to join the Tea Party leaving today's Reform Party a shadow of its former self. But it does still exist. But it now just stands for the flavor of the day. One election they nominated Pat Buchannan. Next election they nominated Ralph Nader! It doesn't get any more disjointed than that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Party_of_the_United_States_of_America
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We need to avoid going third party. Thinking that a third party would have more leverage [View all]
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
OP
That may be but that's the fight as I see it. Relinquishing the Party to them
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#2
We have little leverage now. But I doubt Sen Warren would jump to a Third Party.
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#5
I would be happy with a second party. That appears to be why so many people are, as we are here,
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#33
It would take years to build the necessary infrastructure and millions of dollars.
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#8
I've always liked plain ol Reform Party - just like Tea Party it puts the elite on notice that
whereisjustice
Nov 2014
#7
One of my biggest reasons for being unwilling to break off from the Democratic Party.
Half-Century Man
Nov 2014
#15
If I understand, I like where you are going. But I would like some organization.
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#22
I sooo agree. This Party is mine and I will fight to keep it for the people. nm
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#19
Sorry, no can do. It' show time. Now or never. Either Bernie or Warren or someone like them gets
silvershadow
Nov 2014
#28