Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
12. Yes, he was.
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 06:26 PM
Apr 2015

Especially in comparison to anybody now. But he was still a member of the elite, and kept a socialist revolution (peaceful or not) from happening. Many of the policies he instituted were designed to give just enough to just enough people in order to maintain the status quo. There was still huge numbers in poverty after him. I am not necessarily criticizing him, just using him as an example of the way the Democratic Party has historically allied itself against radical change.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Hillary Clinton Blasts Pa...»Reply #12