Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
9. What does your question have to do with the allegation you made which apparently you
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 03:13 AM
Feb 2014

are unwilling to produce any evidence for? The question is based on a false premise. So far as I know the only ones potentially harmed are the perpetrators who have been violating our Constitutional rights for years now.


And since when did this country care about putting people in harm's way, except when it suits them to try to cover up the crimes of the rich and powerful?

Remember Valerie Plame? I haven't seen much concern for her or for those she was associated with who were exposed for POLITICAL purposes by a rogue band of people headed by the VP himself who were entrusted with the protection of people like Valerie Plame.

There is no rule of law in this country anymore IF you are rich and powerful enough. So the pretense of outrage that a Whistle Blower 'might, maybe. possibly, probably' or whatever the allegation is, have 'put someone in harm's way' is, in a macabre sort of way, amusing.

Each time they are caught committing crimes against the people, we are treated to the same old 'national security' nonsense. Great way to hide massive crimes, 'just trust us if you find out about our crimes, it will damage national security. No, it won't. NOTHING harmed this country's National Security more than the outrageous, criminal lies that led this country into never ending war.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Progressive Media Resources Group»Edward Snowden in Intervi...»Reply #9