Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Interfaith Group

okasha

(11,573 posts)

7. That pretty much echoes my experience.

Reply to NYC_SKP (Reply #3)

Wed Mar 18, 2015, 09:26 PM

Mar 2015

McCarthy freaks (I was one) "got clean for Gene" when he went up against LBJ. Contemporary usage seems universally negative, though, and one should always consider the source.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The term Jesus Freak is a demeaning term. [View all] hrmjustin Mar 2015 OP

You may be too young to remember it's origins. cbayer Mar 2015 #1

I doubt it was meant that way. Could be but I doubt it. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #2

Oh, I don't doubt that it can be used in a very negative way and would not cbayer Mar 2015 #5

I need a thicker skin but I can not embrace the term. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #6

I feel that way, too. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #3

Thats how I feel. I think it is a put down. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #4

That pretty much echoes my experience. okasha Mar 2015 #7

Perhaps the "Ignore" button needs to be put to use again. No Vested Interest Mar 2015 #8

Damn that DC talk!! XD LostOne4Ever Mar 2015 #9

I take it in good fun my friend. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #10