Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Interfaith Group

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)

11. Because the "tea party" is not in charge, if you want to see a reduction in violence by doing what

Reply to cbayer (Reply #10)

Wed Mar 20, 2013, 05:01 PM

Mar 2013

you mentioned in the OP that the many Episcopalians are doing to do so by seeking to change the "economic conditions that spawn violence," I think that we sould focus upon the national politicians who can (theoritically) change policies.

The "tea party" did not participate in approving of the transfer of money for endless wars and occupations, the transferring of money to the banksters, and the shifting of jobs to foreign countries. When there is a bad performance at a circus, I don't blame the clowns.

Let's push for a change in the "economic conditions that spawn violence."

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Galvanized by Gun Violence, Episcopalians Respond [View all] cbayer Mar 2013 OP

Focusing upon "the economic conditions that spawn violence" is absolutely essential. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #1

As rich as the rich may be, they still only get one vote a piece. cbayer Mar 2013 #2

I'm not sure how that works. In the Senate, if you subtract Sanders and Warren, they still have 98 AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #3

I have been rather taken aback by the lack of vocal support for the poor in this cbayer Mar 2013 #5

"I think more attention is being paid to the 'middle class'."? In what way? AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #7

While I don't disagree with much of what you say, I am optimistic about some cbayer Mar 2013 #8

If you are referring to the Affordable Care Act, and even if the beneficiaries of that Act are the AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #9

I guess I am just somewhat more optimistic than you. cbayer Mar 2013 #10

Because the "tea party" is not in charge, if you want to see a reduction in violence by doing what AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #11

We agree. cbayer Mar 2013 #12

One vote, but many lobbyists, foundations, think tanks and media outlets. (nt) PETRUS Mar 2013 #4

All true, but there are also activist groups like this. cbayer Mar 2013 #6