Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Interfaith Group

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)

3. I'm not sure how that works. In the Senate, if you subtract Sanders and Warren, they still have 98

Reply to cbayer (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 20, 2013, 11:18 AM

Mar 2013

votes. Maybe they have fewer, but we haven't seen any evidence of that.

In the House, they have even more votes. In major cities, ...

The level of the DOW does not reflect the economy for ordinary Americans. The endless wars and occupations, the transferring of money to the banksters, and the shifting of jobs to foreign countries, is breaking this country.

With few exceptions, there are no nationally known politicians who seem to care at all about what is happening to the economic conditions of ordinary Americans. Can you think of many besides Sanders and Warren?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Galvanized by Gun Violence, Episcopalians Respond [View all] cbayer Mar 2013 OP

Focusing upon "the economic conditions that spawn violence" is absolutely essential. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #1

As rich as the rich may be, they still only get one vote a piece. cbayer Mar 2013 #2

I'm not sure how that works. In the Senate, if you subtract Sanders and Warren, they still have 98 AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #3

I have been rather taken aback by the lack of vocal support for the poor in this cbayer Mar 2013 #5

"I think more attention is being paid to the 'middle class'."? In what way? AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #7

While I don't disagree with much of what you say, I am optimistic about some cbayer Mar 2013 #8

If you are referring to the Affordable Care Act, and even if the beneficiaries of that Act are the AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #9

I guess I am just somewhat more optimistic than you. cbayer Mar 2013 #10

Because the "tea party" is not in charge, if you want to see a reduction in violence by doing what AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #11

We agree. cbayer Mar 2013 #12

One vote, but many lobbyists, foundations, think tanks and media outlets. (nt) PETRUS Mar 2013 #4

All true, but there are also activist groups like this. cbayer Mar 2013 #6