Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Interfaith Group

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
Fri Aug 2, 2013, 02:44 PM Aug 2013

Archaeologists believe they've found cross of Jesus of Nazareth [View all]

Archaeologists working at an ancient church in Turkey think they've unearthed a piece of the world's most famous cross, the one used to crucify Jesus.

They found a stone chest during excavation at a 1,350-year-old church, and the chest had a number of relics inside believed to be associated with the crucifixion, a historian at Turkey's Mimar Sinan University of Fine Arts tells the Hurriyet Daily News.

"We have found a holy thing in a chest," she says. "It is a piece of a cross," and they think it's from the cross.

The entire chest is now undergoing lab tests, reports NBC News. Researchers aren't sure who owned the chest, but it was probably a religious person of some importance, and that person apparently believed the cross relic was the real deal.


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/08/02/newser-jesus-cross-archaeologists/2611357/

Video from NBC: http://www.today.com/video/today/52651272#52651272

Cross posting from GD with OP's permission.

Would be something if it were true.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How could they possibly come to that conclusion? Squinch Aug 2013 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author hrmjustin Aug 2013 #2
I'm not saying that faith is misplaced. I am stating the fact that there is no physical evidence Squinch Aug 2013 #3
Ok fair point. I tend to think it is not the real thing myself but it would be something if it was. hrmjustin Aug 2013 #4
No worries. Squinch Aug 2013 #5
Thank you. I hate acting like a hall monitor at times. hrmjustin Aug 2013 #7
Two points: okasha Aug 2013 #15
Thank you for posting this here. kentauros Aug 2013 #6
Your welcome. My opinion is that you really can not prove either way if it is genuine. hrmjustin Aug 2013 #8
Well, as Squinch pointed out, kentauros Aug 2013 #9
That was the OP that said that. I want to go back in there but I know they hrmjustin Aug 2013 #10
Okay, thanks for the correction. kentauros Aug 2013 #11
Thanks. hrmjustin Aug 2013 #12
Interesting isn't it that the whole point of faith is belief when there is no proof. NRaleighLiberal Aug 2013 #13
Your welcome! hrmjustin Aug 2013 #14
Just out of curiosity-- okasha Aug 2013 #16
because then it would not require faith, in principle...without stating my belief or lack thereof NRaleighLiberal Aug 2013 #17
Sorry, still puzzled. okasha Aug 2013 #18
One state of mind tells me that if proof were possible, it would be too easy - NRaleighLiberal Aug 2013 #19
Probably not. jeepnstein Aug 2013 #20
There are enough pieces of "the true cross" to build a ship Fortinbras Armstrong Aug 2013 #21
It will be interesting to see what results come out of the dating processs goldent Aug 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»Archaeologists believe th...»Reply #0