Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
21. That's certainly true. The difference here is that it's an investigating Grand Jury.
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 01:28 PM
Apr 2013

Since Pennsylvania replaced Grand Juries for criminal offenses with preliminary hearings, its function is now primarily investigative. It recommends that the DA file a Criminal Information rather than indict itself.

When I worked for Legal Aid in NYC we developed a modest Grand Jury practice. In appropriate cases we'd tell the Defendant to testify there. We had a fair number of No True Bills. My favorite was this old man who was fighting with his landlord. He got mad one day and slipped the rent bill under the office door and lit the end that was sticking out. They arrested him for Arson! He testified and in the middle pulled out his vial of blood pressure pills and said the landlord was going to give him a heart attack. The DA started to yell at him to put the pills away and the old man was yelling back at him. It was spectacular. This particular Grand Jury was able to put the whole matter in perspective and declined to indict.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is a shocking story goldent Apr 2013 #1
It is the first I have heard of it as well. cbayer Apr 2013 #3
I'm not sure I understand... goldent Apr 2013 #6
Me neither. This seems like it would have been red meat for the MSM. cbayer Apr 2013 #7
Did you see the Grand Jury Report? rug Apr 2013 #2
Wow! Had you heard of this previously? cbayer Apr 2013 #4
No, I saw the GD thread and pulled this up. rug Apr 2013 #13
Is an Appellant an attorney who is representing others or the injured party? cbayer Apr 2013 #15
No, it's the woman it happened to. rug Apr 2013 #18
Thanks for the explanation. I recall similar things but much of it has faded for me. cbayer Apr 2013 #19
As a side topic.... goldent Apr 2013 #5
Yes, it was wriiten by the presenting DA. rug Apr 2013 #14
It's proverbial that a federal (or any other) okasha Apr 2013 #20
That's certainly true. The difference here is that it's an investigating Grand Jury. rug Apr 2013 #21
Maybe Ken Starr - He's good at detail. No Vested Interest May 2013 #25
I am familiar with this, seeing that I live in philadelphia Heddi Apr 2013 #8
Three rows of seats reserved for the media completely empty? Really? cbayer Apr 2013 #9
I read that a while back. musical_soul May 2013 #23
this is an alleged serial killer.not a doctor.not about pro.choice nt UTUSN Apr 2013 #10
Totally agree with you. It's not about abortion rights at all. cbayer Apr 2013 #11
i stick to gd.lounge. lovely to c.u.too. wingnuts have been calling it.abortion.nt UTUSN Apr 2013 #12
Pennsylvania politics of abortion locks Apr 2013 #16
This is an amazingly shocking story and still not getting the press I thought it would today. cbayer Apr 2013 #17
We all knew who Elizabeth Smart was when she was abducted from her home. We all knew within MADem May 2013 #26
Exactly. The Mother's Day shootings in New Orleans got about 1 hour of press. cbayer May 2013 #27
I understand that the women were poor.... musical_soul May 2013 #24
Let's put it this way. musical_soul May 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»Yes, Let’s Talk About Ker...»Reply #21