Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

goldent

(1,582 posts)
6. I'm not sure I understand...
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 02:46 PM
Apr 2013

The pro-choice and pro-life advocates might have had reasons for not publicizing this case, although I can't quite see why the pro-life advocates would not be shouting about it.

But beyond that, this is a sensational story with lots of blood and horror and it seems atypical for this not to be big news. I checked CNN, NY Times, and Fox News and they all have stories going back to Jan 2011, so it clearly was reported. A murder of 7+ people would normally be huge, but as mentioned in the article, the infants who were killed did not have names or any life history, so it makes it less compelling.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is a shocking story goldent Apr 2013 #1
It is the first I have heard of it as well. cbayer Apr 2013 #3
I'm not sure I understand... goldent Apr 2013 #6
Me neither. This seems like it would have been red meat for the MSM. cbayer Apr 2013 #7
Did you see the Grand Jury Report? rug Apr 2013 #2
Wow! Had you heard of this previously? cbayer Apr 2013 #4
No, I saw the GD thread and pulled this up. rug Apr 2013 #13
Is an Appellant an attorney who is representing others or the injured party? cbayer Apr 2013 #15
No, it's the woman it happened to. rug Apr 2013 #18
Thanks for the explanation. I recall similar things but much of it has faded for me. cbayer Apr 2013 #19
As a side topic.... goldent Apr 2013 #5
Yes, it was wriiten by the presenting DA. rug Apr 2013 #14
It's proverbial that a federal (or any other) okasha Apr 2013 #20
That's certainly true. The difference here is that it's an investigating Grand Jury. rug Apr 2013 #21
Maybe Ken Starr - He's good at detail. No Vested Interest May 2013 #25
I am familiar with this, seeing that I live in philadelphia Heddi Apr 2013 #8
Three rows of seats reserved for the media completely empty? Really? cbayer Apr 2013 #9
I read that a while back. musical_soul May 2013 #23
this is an alleged serial killer.not a doctor.not about pro.choice nt UTUSN Apr 2013 #10
Totally agree with you. It's not about abortion rights at all. cbayer Apr 2013 #11
i stick to gd.lounge. lovely to c.u.too. wingnuts have been calling it.abortion.nt UTUSN Apr 2013 #12
Pennsylvania politics of abortion locks Apr 2013 #16
This is an amazingly shocking story and still not getting the press I thought it would today. cbayer Apr 2013 #17
We all knew who Elizabeth Smart was when she was abducted from her home. We all knew within MADem May 2013 #26
Exactly. The Mother's Day shootings in New Orleans got about 1 hour of press. cbayer May 2013 #27
I understand that the women were poor.... musical_soul May 2013 #24
Let's put it this way. musical_soul May 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»Yes, Let’s Talk About Ker...»Reply #6