Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
10. on the mark again
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 12:57 PM
Feb 2015

Many people seem to feel that the phrase "...the right of the people to keep..." refers to each individual person. The Founders specifically talked about "a well regulated militia..." in the context of possession of firearms.

In my view, D.C. v Heller applies the same reasoning. The Amendment must be read in its entirety, not have words or phrases cherry picked out of context to support a viewpoint. Given that the Founders made no provision for a standing army, and given the emphasis on a well regulated militia, to assert that any individual citizen has a right to carry a gun is a ridiculous selective reading of the 2ND Amendment.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»This message was self-del...»Reply #10