Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
1. I agree. Where I live, you can't carry a sword or a collapsing baton, but one can tote a gun
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 02:57 PM
Feb 2014

on city streets. That is insane.

If guns were not primarily lethal weapons, there would be few shooting ranges, gun stores, gun shows, yahoos toting/accumulating them, manufacturers pandering to yahoos' baser instincts, etc. Guns as pure entertainment -- totally detached from their capability to wound, kill, intimidate, blow things up, etc. -- would be almost nil.

Folks would rather throw darts. Can you imagine a National Dart Association with Ted Nugent, John Bolton, Ollie North, Grover Norquist, Wayne LaPierre, Big Jim Porter, major dart manufacturer representatives in leadership positions and practically owning Congress?

I think someday, the Supreme Court will revisit the 2nd Amendment and find along the lines of the Dissent in Heller. Maybe something similar to Australia's 1996 tough gun laws is on the horizon.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»When is a gun not a gun?»Reply #1