Gun Control Reform Activism
In reply to the discussion: Yes I Shot That Kid - Brian Cloninger [View all]billh58
(6,649 posts)gun apologist bullshit again. Yes Skippy, we DO know that "he had one intent" and that was to shoot someone or he wouldn't have been carrying a fucking gun in public. The "someone" turned out to be an 8-year old kid whose face is shattered. No one "rushed" to judgment -- we know what this public menace intended from the start. Guns are designed to kill people. He had a gun. He shot an innocent child. Case closed.
This Group is for those of us who believe that the time for discussing motives, intentions, and justifications is long passed. It is now time for discussing the control and regulation of lethal weapons on our streets, and how to make these kinds of outrageous shootings a rarity, or even better yet -- non-existent. This is a Group for those of us who believe that the NRA's version of the Second Amendment allows for "oopsies" such as this, and they believe that it's a "small price to pay" for their fucking freedom to shoot each other. This is NOT a Group for disrupters like you to espouse theories about the motivations of idiots who carry guns on our streets, but rather it is a Group for the discussion of how the motherfucker got the gun, and why he was allowed to carry it on the street in the first place.
The gunner apologist language that you have used on this thread is highly objectionable to those of us whom you have attempted to justify your "motives" for interrupting this thread. We ain't buying it, and yes your only motive for posting in this Group was to disrupt.
Please enjoy your short stay.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)