Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
2. There is a multi-state effort on to gain prescibing privileges to non MD therapists.
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 02:31 PM
Apr 2013

IMO, a computer algorithm can do reasonably well at this sort of work, so there is really no reason why, with proper training a PhD couldn't learn how to do this. Other areas have expanded prescription powers...at the Milwaukee V.A. I don't see an MD for cholesterol Rx's, rather my prescriptions are written by PhD pharmacist interns working under an experienced pharmacist.

From a perimedical point of view, the politics of medicine involve a lot of artificial delineations. One of the seriously harmful delineations is the artificial separation of mental health from medicine.

The problems with that go well beyond mere protecting of profitable positions within the healthcare marketplace. It creates an illusion that mental illnesses are something distinct from medical illnesses and that they don't deserve, or receive, equivalent treatment from health care funders.

So NAMI's position is complex. On balance the NAMI Illinois folks have decided that insisting that prescribing psychiatric medication be a role of an MD is in the best interest of integrating medicine and psychiatry.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Mental Health Information»NAMI Illinois Rejects Psy...»Reply #2