Rape threats are a dime a dozen on the internet.

[NuclearDem]

16. Oh boy.

Does that mean I shouldn't patronize my grocer because he sells beets, fresh, canned and jarred?

If you really wanted them to stop selling them, then yes, you would boycott them and not buy until they stopped. That's how it works.

There are a lot of places I don't go anymore since becoming vegan, and a lot of entertainment I don't patronize anymore because of its misogyny and homophobia. There are parts I miss about all of it, but I'm willing to sacrifice that until changes get made.

You want--out of some entirely pointless "principle" -- the site owners to forgo a portion of their INCOME, the food on their plate, the cash that ensures their survival, so you can have some sort of stupid "satisfaction" by "controlling" nothing more than WHERE people say nasty things. You aren't going to stop them--you're just going to have a harder time tracking them.

Income being partly made off of some of the most vile racists and misogynists I've seen on the web.

That nastiness won't disappear if that site gets shut down

Nirvana fallacy.

Of course, we could always demand that the US government fire up an "internet police" to monitor objectionable content, and censor anything "offensive" to people--how does that sound?

Absolutely ridiculous. Me asking a private business owner to make changes to practices I find objectionable in no way means I have any interest in seeing government ban speech.