History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: Not for Nothing ... but, Am I the Only One to think that it is a travesty that of ALL the times [View all]DonCoquixote
(13,753 posts)JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Fri Jul 4, 2014, 12:50 PM, and voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: ..........
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The games people play...
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I'm not a frequent visitor to H of Fem, but think they should be able to ban libodem. Obvious attempt to start trouble, for no reason.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If you don't want people to remark on her "vacation", don't bring it up yourself. seabeyond is one of the most belligerent DUers we have. If she could learn to be less hostile in her posts, they'd have far more impact.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Flamebaiting, misogynist troll.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Awww. Looks like we can't handle a difference of opinion. LEAVE IT
Thank you.
So, we get two votes by that brave and effective protector of bullies "No explanation given." One whose malice for seabeyond drips, as well as a propensity to order people around "don't bring it up yourself" and lastly some little brat that goes Awww, as if anyone that disagrees with it or his friends attempt to bully and belittle is to be scorned. Never mind that the only reason this post is up because because it was hidden by two COWARDS who were either too scared to admit why they voted, or too lazy, in which case, they had no buisness voting.
Seriously, I am half tempted to post my own version of the DUzy awards, one dedicated to lousy Jury decisions.