History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: To those who claim that feminism is somehow about being "sex-negative"... [View all]KitSileya
(4,035 posts)"Sex negative" is when you support women (and men!) making choices other than having sex all the time with everyone who wants it. Daring to support women (and men!) not having sex, supporting people when they do not want to have sex and sexual images forced before their eyes. Daring to say that while sex is something natural and a part of many people's lives, there are a segment of people who are asexual, and they have as much a right to a sex-free environment as people who love sex have the right to exercise their wish to have sex. That even people who love sex may want certain venues that are free of sexual images and sexual behavior and descriptions of sex.
"Sex negative" is when you recognize that in many situations, consent isn't or cannot be given freely, because of reasons other than pure violence. When you say that blackmail, emotional pressure, money dependence, impaired judgment, behavior, and age can cast doubt over whether consent was freely given, and that is a cause for concern.
In other words, you're "sex negative" not because you think sex is shameful, and have an unhealthy attitude towards sex, and think badly about anyone who has sex - you are "sex negative" because you lessen their chances of getting laid. And we all know that another word for "sex negative" is "prude"....and "HoFer" and "a certain group on DU", or "Some die-hards that make DU suck (because we can't post sexualized images and drool over them without push-back)".
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):