Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(42,522 posts)
11. According to the article in LBN, this is incorrect
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:23 PM
Mar 2014

They're apparently was NO law against this at all, and what actually happened is they signed it into law as a misdemeanor, so the title here is misleading.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014748069


(CNN) -- Modern-day peeping Toms in Massachusetts, the sorts who get their thrills snapping "upskirt" photos on crowded subways, now have their behavior criminalized.
Gov. Deval Patrick signed a bill Friday, according to his office, making photographing or recording video under a person's clothing -- think down a blouse or up a skirt -- a misdemeanor.
"The legislation makes the secret photographing, videotaping, or electronically surveiling of another person's sexual or other intimate parts, whether under or around a person's clothing or when a reasonable person would believe that the person's intimate parts would not be visible to the public, a crime," Patrick's office said in a prepared statement.
The crime is punishable by up 2½ years in jail or a fine of up to $5,000.
In addition, the law states that "whoever videotapes or photographs, with the intent to secretly conduct or hide such activity, the sexual or other intimate parts of a child" faces a sentence of 2½ to 5 years and up to a $5,000 fine. The law goes into effect immediately.



http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/07/justice/massachusetts-upskirt-bill/index.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Seriously people? Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #1
Charming dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #2
Camera Phone $300 One_Life_To_Give Mar 2014 #3
uhm ... Tuesday Afternoon Mar 2014 #4
Giggity!! BuckIA Mar 2014 #5
40 posts in 4 years and you come out sufrommich Mar 2014 #10
Kinda creepy, little fella... LanternWaste Mar 2014 #12
Another law with a loophole needing to be closed - looks like the MA leg is on this seaglass Mar 2014 #6
unfortunately, this is probably the correct legal decision--the legislature needs to act geek tragedy Mar 2014 #7
No longer OK to take upskirt pics in MA seaglass Mar 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #9
According to the article in LBN, this is incorrect ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #11
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»High Court Rules That Ups...»Reply #11