Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Occupy Underground
In reply to the discussion: Occupy is anti NATO all over twitter. Will this alienate people? I thought Occupy did so well [View all]Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)4. Protesting NATO: What to Know About the Secret Service and H.R. 347
https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/protesting-nato-what-know-about-secret-service-and-hr-347
The forthcoming summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, set for May 20 and 21 in Chicago, could be the first public test of H.R. 347, the recently passed law that expanded the ability of the Secret Service to suppress protests in or around certain restricted zones near individuals under its protection. We've written about H.R. 347 here and here.
NATO summits are interesting affairs. Unlike the periodic meetings of member nations, the summits are more stately and elaborate events, meant to introduce major policy changes or new members to the strategic alliance (among other things). This means lots of Very Important Persons, and lots of Very Controversial Issues. Both of these things mean lots of expected First Amendment activity.
As far as H.R. 347 goes, the NATO summit has been declared a "National Special Security Event" by the Department of Homeland Security. This puts the Secret Service in charge of the overall security plan. My understanding is that the FBI chips in with counterterrorism and counterintelligence assistance, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (another DHS agency) is in charge of emergency preparation. It also means massive security preparations and infrastructureand lots of opportunities for the suppression of lawful protest.
The forthcoming summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, set for May 20 and 21 in Chicago, could be the first public test of H.R. 347, the recently passed law that expanded the ability of the Secret Service to suppress protests in or around certain restricted zones near individuals under its protection. We've written about H.R. 347 here and here.
NATO summits are interesting affairs. Unlike the periodic meetings of member nations, the summits are more stately and elaborate events, meant to introduce major policy changes or new members to the strategic alliance (among other things). This means lots of Very Important Persons, and lots of Very Controversial Issues. Both of these things mean lots of expected First Amendment activity.
As far as H.R. 347 goes, the NATO summit has been declared a "National Special Security Event" by the Department of Homeland Security. This puts the Secret Service in charge of the overall security plan. My understanding is that the FBI chips in with counterterrorism and counterintelligence assistance, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (another DHS agency) is in charge of emergency preparation. It also means massive security preparations and infrastructureand lots of opportunities for the suppression of lawful protest.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Occupy is anti NATO all over twitter. Will this alienate people? I thought Occupy did so well [View all]
applegrove
May 2012
OP
And then right wing false flaggers stir the whole mix. Alienating the left from the centre.
applegrove
May 2012
#3
Sure it did. More than 50% of Americans supported Occupy back in the fall. Some of them were
applegrove
May 2012
#25
Occupy may hurt their cause. What made them so amazing was the multiple realities Occupy reflected
applegrove
May 2012
#5
So when the movement started it was slammed for not having specific targets.
Warren Stupidity
May 2012
#6
I have never slammed Occupy. I was thrilled with everything that happened in the fall/winter. I
applegrove
May 2012
#7
But, does anyone know what they are FOR? Teabaggers have managed to...
TreasonousBastard
May 2012
#8
Occupy has changed the focus of political discussion to the growing inequality in the USA. That is
applegrove
May 2012
#9
NATO is not mainstream. They are an elite group of resource-hoarding nations.
U4ikLefty
May 2012
#19
NATO to spend billions on nuclear weapons overhaul - convenient for defense contractors
Fire Walk With Me
May 2012
#21