Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Expat in Korea

(119 posts)
11. I once had the same question as the OP.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 02:02 AM
Oct 2014

I spent years researching (informally) this topic and lived in Thailand for a year as a novice monk. The Pali Canon has the earliest known teachings of the Buddha. I respect Nagarjuna and the Mahayana development, but I could never accept the Mahayana sutras as authentic. They were written centuries after the Buddha's parinibbana (physical death) and there is a very clear shift in emphasis towards faith, the mystical and esoteric. The teachings in the Pali Canon are explicitly exoteric, and that seems to have been the Buddha's intent, seeing as how he said that he held back no secret teachings "in the closed fist of the teacher." That said, I'm all for anyone following whatever brings peace to your life.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Buddhism»Possibly a very stupid qu...»Reply #11