Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
10. Not really a fair assessment of the three existing schools today.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 12:14 PM
Jul 2014

Vajrayana is nothing more than Mahayana Buddhism with some archetypal psychology added to the mix - most of which the lay practitioner will rarely fully practice or realize.

Mahayana and Theravada schools differ in approach but not in outcome.

The Mayahana Buddhist says that in order to achieve enlightenment for oneself, one must love others. By practicing Bodhicitta (open heart) one's heart is then opened.

The Theravada Buddhist says that in order to love others, one must have achieved enlightenment first for oneself. By becoming as the Buddha became, then and only then is the heart opened so that it is fully open towards other.

Both aspire towards enlightenment for oneself and for everyone. They simply approach it from different sides of the same coin. One, then, does not have to make the false choice that you are presenting here. One can simply find the school and approach that works best and then ultimately achieve the same two goals - both/and, not either/or.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Buddhism»Possibly a very stupid qu...»Reply #10