Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
Showing Original Post only (View all)“Religious Restoration” Acts – Not Just About The Gays! [View all]
From the Awkward Moments Children's Bible website (thanks PeaceNikki!):
Religious Restoration Acts Not Just About The Gays!
I feel like I must be missing something.
With the latest Religious Freedom Restoration Act being signed into Indiana law by Governor Mike Pence yesterday, I feel like much of the media and blogosphere is losing sight of the true absurdity of these discrimination laws that keep popping up around the country. In short, they arent only about giving Christians the right to refuse service to homosexuals because of their religious beliefs (devoutly religious bakers, dressmakers, or photographers being forced by the government to provide services to gay couples getting married because Jesus). In fact, in the case of Indiana the text of the bill never mentions Christianity or homosexuals. Not once.
Instead, the irony of all of these Religious Freedom Discrimination bills (like those in various stages in Arizona and Michigan) is that they open a can of worms inviting ANYBODY to refuse service to ANYONE that is at odds with their freedom of religious practice.
Yes, generally speaking, that means that it goes both ways. All ways, really. It is not only the gay community that should be nervous
A Muslim could refuse service to a Christian because of their blasphemy of Mohammed
A Jew could refuse service to a Palestinian because of the disputes in Gaza
A Scientologist could deny a Buddhist because of their e-meter readings
A Christian could refuse service to an atheist because (choose any reason)
A Hindu could refuse service to a cattle rancher because cows!
Absurd enough yet? Lets go on
A Catholic could refuse a Protestant
A Baptist could refuse a Lutheran
A Presbyterian could refuse a Methodist
There are literally thousands of Christian denominations that all disagree on something. Need I go on?!?!?!
The best part is all of this blatant divisiveness would not only be invited by, but protected by the government!
...
If the religious majority of Christian voters and legislators in these states truly want more division and hostility, I say be careful what you wish for. Unfortunately, when rational people oppose such blatant discrimination and division eventually stand up against these voters, legislators, and businesses what tends to happen? Thats right more persecution of the poor Christians! (Its almost as if that was the strategic objective all along.)
I feel like I must be missing something.
With the latest Religious Freedom Restoration Act being signed into Indiana law by Governor Mike Pence yesterday, I feel like much of the media and blogosphere is losing sight of the true absurdity of these discrimination laws that keep popping up around the country. In short, they arent only about giving Christians the right to refuse service to homosexuals because of their religious beliefs (devoutly religious bakers, dressmakers, or photographers being forced by the government to provide services to gay couples getting married because Jesus). In fact, in the case of Indiana the text of the bill never mentions Christianity or homosexuals. Not once.
Instead, the irony of all of these Religious Freedom Discrimination bills (like those in various stages in Arizona and Michigan) is that they open a can of worms inviting ANYBODY to refuse service to ANYONE that is at odds with their freedom of religious practice.
Yes, generally speaking, that means that it goes both ways. All ways, really. It is not only the gay community that should be nervous
A Muslim could refuse service to a Christian because of their blasphemy of Mohammed
A Jew could refuse service to a Palestinian because of the disputes in Gaza
A Scientologist could deny a Buddhist because of their e-meter readings
A Christian could refuse service to an atheist because (choose any reason)
A Hindu could refuse service to a cattle rancher because cows!
Absurd enough yet? Lets go on
A Catholic could refuse a Protestant
A Baptist could refuse a Lutheran
A Presbyterian could refuse a Methodist
There are literally thousands of Christian denominations that all disagree on something. Need I go on?!?!?!
The best part is all of this blatant divisiveness would not only be invited by, but protected by the government!
...
If the religious majority of Christian voters and legislators in these states truly want more division and hostility, I say be careful what you wish for. Unfortunately, when rational people oppose such blatant discrimination and division eventually stand up against these voters, legislators, and businesses what tends to happen? Thats right more persecution of the poor Christians! (Its almost as if that was the strategic objective all along.)
He's right, if they ultimately fail to legalize discrimination it will be just another example of how libruls (the same ones who are viciously attacking defenseless traditional marriage) are ruining this country at the expense of decent christian citizens.
Because it's their country.
And they need to take it back.
From freedom haters.
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In my state (Idaho), even the batshit insane conservatives killed a similar bill
EvolveOrConvolve
Mar 2015
#6
But, but, but the INTENT is merely to discriminate against and restrict the rights of WOMEN, so
PeaceNikki
Apr 2015
#20
We're still fighting tooth and claw for our right to safe legal medical procedures.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2015
#23