Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atheists & Agnostics

Showing Original Post only (View all)

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 06:01 PM Mar 2015

“Religious Restoration” Acts – Not Just About The Gays! [View all]

From the Awkward Moments Children's Bible website (thanks PeaceNikki!):

“Religious Restoration” Acts – Not Just About The Gays!




I feel like I must be missing something.

With the latest “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” being signed into Indiana law by Governor Mike Pence yesterday, I feel like much of the media and blogosphere is losing sight of the true absurdity of these “discrimination” laws that keep popping up around the country. In short, they aren’t only about giving Christians the right to refuse service to homosexuals because of their religious beliefs (devoutly religious bakers, dressmakers, or photographers being forced by the government to provide services to gay couples getting married because… Jesus). In fact, in the case of Indiana – the text of the bill never mentions Christianity or homosexuals. Not once.

Instead, the irony of all of these “Religious Freedom Discrimination” bills (like those in various stages in Arizona and Michigan) is that they open a can of worms – inviting ANYBODY to refuse service to ANYONE that is at odds with their “freedom of religious practice.”

Yes, generally speaking, that means that it goes both ways. All ways, really. It is not only the gay community that should be nervous…

A Muslim could refuse service to a Christian because of their blasphemy of Mohammed
A Jew could refuse service to a Palestinian because of the disputes in Gaza
A Scientologist could deny a Buddhist because of their e-meter readings
A Christian could refuse service to an atheist because… (choose any reason)
A Hindu could refuse service to a cattle rancher because… cows!

Absurd enough yet? Let’s go on…

A Catholic could refuse a Protestant
A Baptist could refuse a Lutheran
A Presbyterian could refuse a Methodist

There are literally thousands of Christian denominations that all disagree on something. Need I go on?!?!?!

The best part is – all of this blatant divisiveness would not only be invited by, but protected by the government!

...

If the religious majority of Christian voters and legislators in these states truly want more division and hostility, I say – be careful what you wish for. Unfortunately, when rational people oppose such blatant discrimination and division eventually stand up against these voters, legislators, and businesses – what tends to happen? That’s right – more “persecution” of the poor Christians! (It’s almost as if that was the strategic objective all along.)



He's right, if they ultimately fail to legalize discrimination it will be just another example of how libruls (the same ones who are viciously attacking defenseless traditional marriage) are ruining this country at the expense of decent christian citizens.

Because it's their country.

And they need to take it back.

From freedom haters.


24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Under most of these laws EvolveOrConvolve Mar 2015 #1
And they're well aware of that. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #4
As if it weren't bad enough already living in Indiana Tobin S. Mar 2015 #2
Join the club. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #5
In my state (Idaho), even the batshit insane conservatives killed a similar bill EvolveOrConvolve Mar 2015 #6
I almost married a cowboy from Idaho. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #8
I live in Georgia. Brainstormy Mar 2015 #9
Are you a native? beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #12
not a native Brainstormy Mar 2015 #17
I hope you're right. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #19
Just moved right next door to SC onager Mar 2015 #18
It could even be worse than that. Curmudgeoness Mar 2015 #3
I'm sure it will be. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #7
Hit 'em where it hurts--right in the pocketbook. bvf Mar 2015 #10
Even that will only make them dig in their heels. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #14
Missed that the first time around. bvf Mar 2015 #15
It's almost like it was invented for it. beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #16
"We could end up with another legal discrimination against blacks, " AlbertCat Mar 2015 #11
But don't you see, Albert, beam me up scottie Mar 2015 #13
"All of this is already unconstitutional." Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #21
But, but, but the INTENT is merely to discriminate against and restrict the rights of WOMEN, so PeaceNikki Apr 2015 #20
We're still fighting tooth and claw for our right to safe legal medical procedures. beam me up scottie Apr 2015 #23
A happy Easter thought! onager Apr 2015 #22
Another great man. beam me up scottie Apr 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»“Religious Restoration” A...»Reply #0