Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Random Boomer

(4,271 posts)
7. You're conflating two different kinds of aggression
Wed Nov 23, 2022, 04:10 PM
Nov 2022

There's reactive aggression in which an individual gets angry at another person and lashes out, versus premeditated aggression where an attack is planned in order to gain something (land, resources, prestige).

Compared to other apes (including bonobos), humans have significantly less reactive aggression. This is a reflection of domestication, and it results in unusually high levels of cooperation within a group. Conversely, humans have much higher rates of premeditated aggression between groups (tribes, countries) under certain circumstances (perceived advantages in the outcome).

That combination makes us extremely competitive with Neanderthals. More effective group cohesion with other humans, and greater likelihood of attacking Neanderthals if there is a perceived advantage for doing so.

Again, I highly recommend the book I cited on how human aggression developed as our species forked from other apes.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Anthropology»8 billion people: how dif...»Reply #7