Did Eating Meat Make Us Human? Don't Be So Sure, New Study Says [View all]
By Stephen Luntz
24 JAN 2022, 20:00
Some anthropologists have noted early evidence of meat-eating around the time Homo erectus evolved, which sported an exceptionally large brain for a creature of its size. The apparent correlation between these events has led both experts and ordinary observers to endorse the Meat made us human hypothesis. However, a reanalysis of these sites casts doubt on these conclusions, showing the association may be an illusion based on biased site sampling.
The idea that large brains need animal protein (and a few micro-nutrients) to grow is so beguiling that the Australian Meat and Livestock industry ran a major campaign on it, fronted by Sam Neill fresh from playing Jurassic Park paleontologist Alan Grant.
Inevitably, vegetarians questioned the tagline of Red Meat We Were Meant To Eat It. Now, a paper in Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences reveals that the campaign's critics may have been right all along.
Generations of paleoanthropologists have gone to famously well-preserved sites in places like Olduvai Gorge looking for and finding breathtaking direct evidence of early humans eating meat, furthering this viewpoint that there was an explosion of meat eating after 2 million years ago, lead author Dr Andrew Barr of George Washington University said in a statement.
More:
https://www.iflscience.com/brain/did-eating-meat-make-us-human-dont-be-so-sure-new-study-says/