Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(37,805 posts)
3. No mention in the article how much they'll carrying. At $1 trillion/gm, I'm guessing not much.
Sun Dec 8, 2024, 02:48 PM
Dec 8

Annihilation of the entire shipment might release a few nanojoules of energy; all those big supercon magnets present a bigger hazard if they should quench, or the cryocoolants blow out for some other reason. Probably the biggest danger is the loss of very expensive, highly specialized equipment; a sudden quench can cause serious damage, and the equipment involved is usually made to high precision, which is all lost when stuff gets bent out of shape.

Interesting they referred to a 2009 pop-lit thriller to add credence(?!?) to something that's been discussed in pop-sci literature and SF for decades. I guess those weren't best-sellers, so they don't count.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»The most dangerous delive...»Reply #3