Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Finally, There Are More Young Americans Who 'Believe' in Evolution Than Creationism [View all]Cartoonist
(7,569 posts)13. You're still wrong about Occam.
I didn't mean to imply that you were using OR, just that anyone trying to use it to prove God's existence was blowing out his ass and was promptly laughed at. It's like pointing to a tree and saying, there's your proof.
As for the big bang, OR doesn't apply there either. It's kind of like a placeholder. We once believed the Sun orbited the Earth. That was updated once we figured it out. All the questions about the Big Bang are still unanswered, but it still beats creationism by a light year.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Finally, There Are More Young Americans Who 'Believe' in Evolution Than Creationism [View all]
NeoGreen
Feb 2020
OP
Yes, here we go again. Religious belief is no different than trust in science.
Major Nikon
Feb 2020
#5
Who the fuck is positing Ockham's Razor as a "Proof" or "bulletproof assertion of actual fact"
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2020
#36
Dictionaries I can find suggest it's related to words for either 'love' or 'precious'/'pleasing'
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2020
#40