Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Why "Christianity Today" Is Irrelevant. [View all]The Velveteen Ocelot
(123,557 posts)7. I don't think it's irrelevant - the editorial has received so much publicity
that it might have more effect than is reflected by the small number of regular readers. While it might not change many minds, maybe a few seeds have been planted here and there. The focus of the editorial, along with a follow-up piece is important because it points out that the evangelical movement's devotion to Trump will ultimately harm the church:
The problem is that we as evangelicals are also associated with President Trumps rampant immorality, greed, and corruption; his divisiveness and race-baiting; his cruelty and hostility to immigrants and refugees; and more. In other words, the problem is the wholeheartedness of the embrace. It is one thing to praise his accomplishments; it is another to excuse and deny his obvious misuses of power.
Similarly, this is neither a criticism of the evangelical Trump voter nor an endorsement of the Democrats. The 2016 election confronted evangelical voters with an impossible dilemma: Vote for a pro-choice candidate whose policies would advance so much of what we oppose, or vote for an extravagantly immoral candidate who could well damage the standing of the republic and the witness of the church.
We nevertheless believe the evangelical alliance with this presidency has done damage to our witness here and abroad. The cost has been too high. American evangelicalism is not a Republican PAC. We are a diverse movement that should collaborate with political parties when prudent but always standing apart, at a prophetic distance, to be what Martin Luther King, Jr. called the conscience of the state. That is what we believe. This is where we plant our flag. We know we are not alone.
Similarly, this is neither a criticism of the evangelical Trump voter nor an endorsement of the Democrats. The 2016 election confronted evangelical voters with an impossible dilemma: Vote for a pro-choice candidate whose policies would advance so much of what we oppose, or vote for an extravagantly immoral candidate who could well damage the standing of the republic and the witness of the church.
We nevertheless believe the evangelical alliance with this presidency has done damage to our witness here and abroad. The cost has been too high. American evangelicalism is not a Republican PAC. We are a diverse movement that should collaborate with political parties when prudent but always standing apart, at a prophetic distance, to be what Martin Luther King, Jr. called the conscience of the state. That is what we believe. This is where we plant our flag. We know we are not alone.
In other words, they are calling on evangelicals to back away from being so closely allied with Trump that their own reputation and that of their evangelical churches will eventually be harmed - as seems to be happening already. Religious affiliation is decreasing among young people in general, and the word "Christian" has come to be associated entirely with the extreme evangelical/fundamentalists, even though there are plenty of churchgoing liberals - I know a lot of them, and they detest Trump and Trumpism as much as I do. I think it's a small crack in a wall where many other small cracks are starting to appear, and I'm glad for that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

What started out as merely symbolic has blown up on RW media and /w Trumpsters to be
hlthe2b
Dec 2019
#1
I don't think it's irrelevant - the editorial has received so much publicity
The Velveteen Ocelot
Dec 2019
#7
It's not the magazine, it's the publicity that the editorial has stirred up,
The Velveteen Ocelot
Dec 2019
#14