Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Kind of Blue

(8,709 posts)
Mon May 27, 2019, 11:36 AM May 2019

Hello, Religion Group members. [View all]

I was invited and it's a pleasure to cross-post this OP here.

God Is So Not Pro-Life

Most of us probably know this but I find the following useful in bolstering my counter-arguments IRL about "what God says."

Scriptural truths

Ten biblical episodes and prophecies provide an unequivocal expression of God's attitude toward human life, especially the ontological status of "unborn children" and their pregnant mothers-to-be. Brief summaries:

• A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25).
• The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31).
• God enumerated his punishments for disobedience, including "cursed shall be the fruit of your womb" and "you will eat the fruit of your womb," directly contradicting sanctity-of-life claims (Deuteronomy 28:18,53).
• Elisha's prophecy for soon-to-be King Hazael said he would attack the Israelites, burn their cities, crush the heads of their babies and rip open their pregnant women (2 Kings 8:12).
• King Menahem of Israel destroyed Tiphsah (also called Tappuah) and the surrounding towns, killing all residents and ripping open pregnant women with the sword (2 Kings 15:16).
• Isaiah prophesied doom for Babylon, including the murder of unborn children: "They will have no pity on the fruit of the womb" (Isaiah 13:18).
• For worshiping idols, God declared that not one of his people would live, not a man, woman or child (not even babies in arms), again confuting assertions about the sanctity of life (Jeremiah 44: 7-8).
• God will punish the Israelites by destroying their unborn children, who will die at birth, or perish in the womb, or never even be conceived (Hosea 9:10-16).
• For rebelling against God, Samaria's people will be killed, their babies will be dashed to death against the ground, and their pregnant women will be ripped open with a sword (Hosea 13:16).


And good Lord! Jesus on the end times...
"Woe to pregnant women and those who are nursing" (Matthew 24:19).
That's all he had to say!
https://ffrf.org/component/k2/item/25602-abortion-rights

Likewise, throughout the history of the early church into the middle-ages, there is little to no mention of abortion as a topic of great alarm – from the days of the Old Testament until modern history. Hence, there is no case to be made for a definitive Christian stance throughout history on the spiritual or moral aspects of abortion. Arguably, three of the most prominent authorities on Christian doctrine and teachings historically would be the Apostle Paul, St. Augustine in the 5th century and St. Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century, and compared to Christian leaders today, these figures are mostly silent on the topic. Traditionally the Church was “tolerant” on abortion before the third trimester, from the time of the early church until the late 19th century.

St. Augustine is considered a Christian doctrinal authority in all respects, helping to shape the Christian religion and finer points of doctrine and practices. His statements and teaching on abortion can be summarized in this quote: “The law does not provide that the act (abortion) pertains to homicide, for there cannot yet be said to be a live soul in a body that lacks sensation.” He was simply reiterating the traditional Jewish view…that the destruction of a fetus could be considered homicide only at a relatively late stage of fetal development.

St. Thomas Aquinas held a similar view in not calling abortion homicide until around the third trimester. Aquinas did not believe in life at conception, but rather “ensoulment.” He offered no defense for abortion, but also did not give the matter much importance in comparison to his other writings.

Abortion was very prevalent in many of the places Paul visited – we know this from other historical texts, and as he mentions in his letters, these cities were brimming with prostitution and illicit sexual activity. In fact, Paul never had a problem speaking out on any topic he believed followers of Christ should pay attention to!

There are 3,000 verses in the Bible that are concerned with social justice, taking care of the poor, the stranger, attitudes of kindness and compassion. It is dominant in the Old Testament and the New Testament and there is no ambiguity.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-truth-about-christianity-and-abortion_b_58f52ed7e4b048372700dab5
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hello, Religion Group members. [View all] Kind of Blue May 2019 OP
The whole "pro-life" thing is nothing more than a false moral construct Major Nikon May 2019 #1
Thanks for that. I'm assuming the RCC is the Roman Catholic Church. Kind of Blue May 2019 #5
"The sanctity of life" has fck-all to do with it. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2019 #2
Good questions and the ones I'm hoping we don't Kind of Blue May 2019 #6
Thanks for sharing that here. MineralMan May 2019 #3
Yeah, they are a godsend... lol Kind of Blue May 2019 #8
You're assuming the Religious Right read their Bibles for guidance. Girard442 May 2019 #4
They claim to. Really, though, they MineralMan May 2019 #7
Sorry but many can quote whole sections Voltaire2 May 2019 #10
There's a big, big difference between parroting cherry-picked verses... Girard442 May 2019 #11
They comprehend it their way. Voltaire2 May 2019 #13
If you say so. Girard442 May 2019 #15
Well it's a damn good thing you've figured out exactly what the bible means. trotsky May 2019 #22
And we see many such cherry picked arguments here. guillaumeb May 2019 #24
Yours is a mistaken assumption. Kind of Blue May 2019 #12
There are no "scriptural truths". All of the texts Voltaire2 May 2019 #9
Agreed but that's not the point of the OP. Kind of Blue May 2019 #14
I don't read the old testament often - just glance through it ocasionly. Too much killing and wars. demosincebirth May 2019 #16
Agreed, demosincebirth. Kind of Blue May 2019 #18
For every written truth... safeinOhio May 2019 #17
So true, safeinOhio. Kind of Blue May 2019 #19
Always point out the Red Letter Bible safeinOhio May 2019 #20
Exactly but I prefer Kind of Blue May 2019 #25
If God wants a say in our legislative process... Act_of_Reparation May 2019 #21
LOL... I hear you, Act_of_Reparation. Kind of Blue May 2019 #26
It'd be nice if all Christians could agree on one interpretation of the bible, yes. trotsky May 2019 #23
Why don't you address the OP? Kind of Blue May 2019 #27
I think their point is... uriel1972 May 2019 #28
Thanks, uriel1972. Safely ignored metaphors are Kind of Blue May 2019 #31
Who decides what's metaphor and what isn't? trotsky May 2019 #33
See Post 34. n/t Kind of Blue May 2019 #35
So everyone decides for themselves, right? trotsky May 2019 #37
Too true... uriel1972 May 2019 #38
"so how can we say with any confidence what it was supposed to have meant" trotsky May 2019 #39
Bingo. Act_of_Reparation May 2019 #40
In the OP, you claim to have a definitive interpretation of what the bible says. trotsky May 2019 #29
The point of the OP is that the Christian nationalist Kind of Blue May 2019 #30
"no scriptural or historical support" trotsky May 2019 #32
"Actually it's got quite a bit of both." Kind of Blue May 2019 #34
You want a cite? Fine. trotsky May 2019 #36
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Hello, Religion Group mem...»Reply #0