Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(36,515 posts)
8. They are reportable.
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 05:12 PM
Jan 2019

In Pennsylvania, a lot of the abuse was reported to the police soon after it was reported to the church. The grand jury saw no reason to put in information that didn't buttress their point. The grand jury assembles a prosecution's case, at best; it doesn't aim for objectivity.

There was often a long lag between when the abuse happened and when the church was notified. And often when the police investigated, even soon after the abuse was alleged to have happened, the investigation went nowhere. The abuser denied it--and with no more evidence, that was that. An abuser can always say he wasn't telling the truth to the priest in the confessional--that's a sin that can be forgiven without the court's blessing. But often the victim's parents said "no" to prosecution. After all, the chief witness is the kid.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The Sanctity of the Confe...»Reply #8