Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Major Nikon

(36,917 posts)

23. Too late!

Reply to guillaumeb (Reply #22)

Mon Jan 14, 2019, 05:51 PM

Jan 2019

The face has been planted and you've been given all the accolades you deserve.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Guardian, Sept. 9,2010: Thank God (and Richard Dawkins) I'm no longer an 'angry atheist' [View all] highplainsdem Jan 2019 OP

"Just as ugly" Major Nikon Jan 2019 #1

Baby steps. Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #2

How much longer before we get to burn them in the town square? Major Nikon Jan 2019 #3

That's the last step before public ads suggesting religion might not have all the answers. Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #5

So atheists need time to "catch up" and do what they condemn theists for doing? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #11

So you tell me what my argument is and then burn it down Major Nikon Jan 2019 #15

Your comment: guillaumeb Jan 2019 #16

Im not going to argue against your silly fallacies Major Nikon Jan 2019 #19

Translation: guillaumeb Jan 2019 #20

Good job, Gil. Follow up your strawman with an even more obvious strawman Major Nikon Jan 2019 #21

No awards are necessary. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #22

Too late! Major Nikon Jan 2019 #23

0 - 3 Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #4

An attempt to discourage dialogue that does not fit the desired narrative? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #12

Absolutely. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #25

Proof for such an assertion might make your psot better. eom guillaumeb Jan 2019 #29

My proof is pretty much everything you've ever posted here. Ever. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #38

Obviously we have differnt interpretations of what constitutes proof. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #40

Obviously we do. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #41

The arguments in the OP are from an atheist author who's been mentioned favorably here: highplainsdem Jan 2019 #6

rug was banned for being a disruptor. trotsky Jan 2019 #8

If you read the links, guillaumeb Jan 2019 #18

I never claimed otherwise. Don't be dishonest. trotsky Jan 2019 #26

Irrelevant. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #30

Caught in a mistake, you wave your hands and pretend no one will notice. trotsky Jan 2019 #31

Most of the people in those two linked threads are no longer MineralMan Jan 2019 #32

It might reflect that what was said made some uncomfortable. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #33

It also might reflect that those people are no longer MineralMan Jan 2019 #34

I felt it was important to note, since the OP claimed the author had been "mentioned favorably." trotsky Jan 2019 #35

Well, discussing people who have been sent away from DU MineralMan Jan 2019 #36

Plenty of years old references here. MineralMan Jan 2019 #37

Wow, reaching for almost 9-year-old OpEds now. trotsky Jan 2019 #7

You keep suggesting I'm referring to all atheists in general when I've made it clear I'm talking highplainsdem Jan 2019 #9

Have you given any examples other than the ad on the bus? Mariana Jan 2019 #10

If enough people tell you that you haven't made yourself clear as saying something. Pope George Ringo II Jan 2019 #13

Interesting you'd say that Major Nikon Jan 2019 #14

Perhaps you could do everyone a favor then. trotsky Jan 2019 #27

Imagine just for a second please. Eko Jan 2019 #17

+1 /nt LongtimeAZDem Jan 2019 #24

Great suggestion... but we know they're not gonna do that. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2019 #39

The vast majority of atheists almost never even mention their atheism. MineralMan Jan 2019 #28