Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(36,515 posts)
3. I stopped when I went to check out why it said the Sumerians emigrated from India.
Sat Jan 12, 2019, 01:42 PM
Jan 2019

It's a theory pretty much nobody but Indians and those who really don't want Sumerians to be indigenous for some reason accept. It grasps at straws using 100-year-old hypotheses that rest on 125-year-old conclusions based on mostly inaccurate data. Ditch the inaccurate part, and you're left with insufficient information for any hypothesis.

Nationalism makes a bad bedrock for theories that need to argue ex silencio.

What's amusing is the assumption that they "appeared" and had to come from somewhere. Now, for Amerindians, yes--there was no human presence here before a certain date. But for Mesopotamia, that date is long, long before the Sumerians put their first stylus to clay.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Animated Cartoon: The His...»Reply #3