Man who believes earth is 6,000 yrs old helping to revise Arizona's education standards on evolution

[trotsky]

27. Allow me to help you understand what I said.

Here's my quote:

You just called someone's religious beliefs "stupid" and said they can't be allowed to teach them. Ordinarily you'd chastise an atheist for making such a statement.

What that referred to is your proven behavior of berating atheists who dared to say that believing in fake things isn't good. It's all over this thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=290018

Now on to something you just said:

Something can be stupid, and still lead to the right result. I've literally said that on here a dozen times. That if a religious based relief gets someone to the right ethical/moral answer, I don't care that it was the wrong "belief" that got them to the right result, so long as it's the right result.

This recalls a discussion you and I had previously where you insisted you could tell "good" Christianity from "bad" Christianity. How do you identify the "right" result for a belief? Please explain.

And to tie that to the topic at hand, why are you allowed to declare specific beliefs "stupid" and decide they can't be taught to children?