Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
13. I answered a question
Tue Apr 8, 2014, 10:03 AM
Apr 2014

Last edited Tue Apr 8, 2014, 02:44 PM - Edit history (1)

the poster asked for honest information.

and recommending books by the likes of Gary Kleck
What is your problem with Kleck, other than the fact that you don't like the results of his research? Dr. Kleck is a respected criminologist whose studies are peer reviewed and published in criminology journals and has received one of his professional organization's highest awards, and it happened to be for Point Blank. None of his research has been funded by the NRA, nor is he likely to show up at the NRA convention. The "gun researchers" you would recommend, including those who claim that they "debunked" Kleck, are the exact opposite. Hemenway et al only publish in in house organs and their work is not peer reviewed, does not appear in criminology journals, and are all funded by either Bloomberg or the Joyce Foundation. Kleck's results were based on objective research, just like Wright and Rossi, with no political motives. The likes of Hemenway and Kellermann are activists who create the results to fit their agenda. Politics have no place in science.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I fully agree with this guy's sentiments. Paladin Apr 2014 #1
I completely agree with what he is saying but, gejohnston Apr 2014 #2
Those kinds of poachers are always a pain, but their impact Eleanors38 Apr 2014 #3
He describes himself as a "born-again non-hunter"... benEzra Apr 2014 #4
If you must hunt why not hunt without a gun oneofthe99 Apr 2014 #5
You don't gejohnston Apr 2014 #6
I posted in that thread because it asked how you acquired your knowledge of firearms oneofthe99 Apr 2014 #7
nothing but, gejohnston Apr 2014 #8
Well where would I go to read more? oneofthe99 Apr 2014 #9
depends on the information you want gejohnston Apr 2014 #10
Thank you for taking the time to do this oneofthe99 Apr 2014 #11
gejohnston, this sort of pro-gun propaganda belongs in Gun Control/RKBA. Paladin Apr 2014 #12
I answered a question gejohnston Apr 2014 #13
Thank you for the deletions. (nt) Paladin Apr 2014 #14
gejohnston and Paladin, thanks for cleaning this up. ManiacJoe Apr 2014 #15
+1. Thanks, MJ. (nt) Paladin Apr 2014 #16
Thanks, I gejohnston Apr 2014 #17
My one issue is he seems to conflate "modern" gear with "shooting". sir pball Apr 2014 #18
Oh, ho! We have the chef-of-the hour, here! Eleanors38 May 2014 #21
I haven't, but I certainly don't keep secrets.. sir pball May 2014 #22
Despite close trimming of the carcass, I've never Eleanors38 May 2014 #23
It's not difficult at all, just time (and space) consuming. sir pball May 2014 #24
Thanks so much. Eleanors38 May 2014 #25
I think SecMo also posted this in another forum. Jenoch Apr 2014 #19
"the firepower they wield" in many areas is a .22. Eleanors38 May 2014 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2014 #26
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Outdoor Life»‘Shooters’ spoiling the s...»Reply #13