Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: The AR platform is no longer lethal enough for the Military. [View all]yagotme
(4,024 posts)24. Google, much?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M16_rifle#:~:text=The%20original%20M16%20rifle%20was%20a%205.56%C3%9745mm%20automatic,to%20become%20the%20US%20military%27s%20standard%20service%20rifle.
Yes, the M-14 was difficult to control in full auto. Yes, it was heavy, and the ammo was heavy. Above excerpt proves my point, though.
In 1958, the Army's Combat Developments Experimentation Command ran experiments with small squads in combat situations using the M14, AR-15, and another rifle designed by Winchester. The resulting study recommended adopting a lightweight rifle like the AR-15. In response, the Army declared that all rifles and machine guns should use the same ammunition, and ordered full production of the M14.[23] However, advocates for the AR-15 gained the attention of Air Force Chief of Staff General Curtis LeMay. After testing the AR-15 with the ammunition manufactured by Remington that Armalite and Colt recommended, the Air Force declared that the AR-15 was its 'standard model' and ordered 8,500 rifles and 8.5 million rounds.
Yes, the M-14 was difficult to control in full auto. Yes, it was heavy, and the ammo was heavy. Above excerpt proves my point, though.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
To the gun industry, dead children are merely collateral damage/acceptable losses for gun industry profits and political
keithbvadu2
Oct 2023
#5
The military industrial complex and their lobby need Need NEED their profits. Got to pay the share holders, right?
mitch96
Oct 2023
#6
The increased power cartridge is an answer to the proliferation of body armor in conflict zones
The Polack MSgt
Oct 2023
#3