Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,603 posts)

6. You reply does highlight an issue that I've talked about.

Reply to krispos42 (Reply #5)

Sat Dec 18, 2021, 06:16 PM

Dec 2021

One common objective of both parties, as I've observed, is frustrating any actions of the other party.

Also, unfortunately, some folks approach some aspects of policy as if they are religious beliefs. Their beliefs are unmoved by logic, proven facts or evidence. For example, there are some who love the idea of UBCs but in return will never accept having suppressors removed from the NFA.

What's this a man dead 22 years? Maybe I'm out of touch with crazier Rs.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

For comparison: [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2021 OP

I've noted this several times krispos42 Dec 2021 #1

One without the other? AndyS Dec 2021 #2

No, it is not part of the social package krispos42 Dec 2021 #4

The social package is whatever we decide it is. AndyS Dec 2021 #7

And so am I. krispos42 Dec 2021 #8

Everything you're saying points to exactly why... discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2021 #3

Republicans used to be fairly sane krispos42 Dec 2021 #5

You reply does highlight an issue that I've talked about. discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2021 #6

How about a UBC for supressors? yagotme Mar 2022 #11

What in the world is this nonsense? jimmy the one Mar 2022 #9

Exactly as you characterized... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2022 #10