Gun Control & RKBA

RotorHead

(63 posts)

12. Reasonable?

Wed May 19, 2021, 10:57 AM

May 2021

I do not think that means what -you- think it means. How many rounds should a lawful person be restricted to, why, and what liability should the public have if it's not enough?

'Heller' didn't "leave" anything open. "Public possesion" was never a part of the case, and thus not addressed.

Meanwhile, while Second Amendment Rights are being restored, crime rates have been on a downward trend since the early 1990's....

And how is Wayne relevant to... well, -anything-, really?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Second Amendment sanctuaries facing 1st court test in Oregon [View all] Eugene May 2021 OP

Wait a minute, the 2nd never mentions the words guns or firearms. multigraincracker May 2021 #1

Many years of court decisions and opinions focus on the items covered by the 2A. discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2021 #2

What was reasonable was no longer after multigraincracker May 2021 #3

re: "It's up to sane gun owners now." discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2021 #4

Background checks, yes. Straw Man May 2021 #5

"delicious wedge issue on a silver platter" Paladin May 2021 #7

Giving myself away? Straw Man May 2021 #8

Don't bother-that sort are only candid when speaking to an amen chorus. friendly_iconoclast May 2021 #10

Huh? RotorHead May 2021 #13

Reasonable? RotorHead May 2021 #12

The first amendment doesn't mention the internet, either. The Mouth May 2021 #6

The ruling will be dependent melm00se May 2021 #9

In my non-attorney opinion... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2021 #11