Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,636 posts)

2. Many years of court decisions and opinions focus on the items covered by the 2A.

Reply to multigraincracker (Reply #1)

Sun May 16, 2021, 06:38 PM

May 2021

Accepted ATF regulations, federal and state laws and the SC decision in the Heller case all outline reasonable restrictions of what the 2A protects. Explosives, shoulder fired or otherwise, are not among those.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Second Amendment sanctuaries facing 1st court test in Oregon [View all] Eugene May 2021 OP

Wait a minute, the 2nd never mentions the words guns or firearms. multigraincracker May 2021 #1

Many years of court decisions and opinions focus on the items covered by the 2A. discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2021 #2

What was reasonable was no longer after multigraincracker May 2021 #3

re: "It's up to sane gun owners now." discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2021 #4

Background checks, yes. Straw Man May 2021 #5

"delicious wedge issue on a silver platter" Paladin May 2021 #7

Giving myself away? Straw Man May 2021 #8

Don't bother-that sort are only candid when speaking to an amen chorus. friendly_iconoclast May 2021 #10

Huh? RotorHead May 2021 #13

Reasonable? RotorHead May 2021 #12

The first amendment doesn't mention the internet, either. The Mouth May 2021 #6

The ruling will be dependent melm00se May 2021 #9

In my non-attorney opinion... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2021 #11