Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: "Senate Dems introduce 'assault weapons' ban bill on 205 gun models" [View all]Then there's the fact that mass shootings (four or more shot excluding the shooter) are increasing in number. By this definition there were 417 mass shootings in 2019. The majority of these shootings are domestic (in family) incidents. They account for at least 1700 deaths/injuries per year. The weapons of choice are the very ones I'm advocating against. It's hard to shoot that many people with a bolt action rifle or a revolver.
"That many people"? You mean four?
I believe that you may be using this site for your stats.
https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/
The definition of "four or more shot" includes incidents where there were no deaths -- 20% of those reported for 2021 to date, with another 30% resulting in only one fatality.
https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/reports/mass-shooting
The "weapons of choice" in the highest-profile and bloodiest incidents may be the "very ones" that you are advocating against, but the casualty numbers in those low-fatality domestic incidents could have easily been achieved with a revolver or bolt action rifle. The number shot compared to the number of fatalities suggests that some of these shootings may have been perpetrated with the lowly .22 or a similar caliber.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

"Senate Dems introduce 'assault weapons' ban bill on 205 gun models" [View all]
krispos42
Mar 2021
OP
Yeah, "they" are a real pain in the ass for you gun enthusiasts, aren't "they"? (nt)
Paladin
Mar 2021
#6
I'm not a gun enthusiast, but banning weapons based on appearances doesn't accomplish anything.
MichMan
Mar 2021
#7
Not true: it makes the self-righteous feel better, and gives the GOP a handy wedge issue
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2021
#11
These are neo-Puritans fighting what they regard as evil. Actual crime stats are almost irrelevant
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2021
#13
Gun controllers are every bit as puritanical as some of the various subgroups in the GOP
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2021
#19
"No more compromise" I was waiting for the "no loaf is better than half a loaf" crowd to show up
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2021
#18
So rather than have the government confiscate all handguns, you would have them confiscate "only"
Dial H For Hero
Mar 2021
#23
You're advocating that the government consficate about 200 million firearms from private hands.
Dial H For Hero
Mar 2021
#29
I would estimate that roughly 75% of privately owned handguns are semiautomatics, and of those
Dial H For Hero
Mar 2021
#31
"Take part or sit back and let people like me do it for you." Forced teaming? Really?
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2021
#33
"Take part or sit back and let people like me do it for you." There is a third alternative.
Dial H For Hero
Mar 2021
#34
People have been arguing that massive gun control is just around the corner for *decades*.
Dial H For Hero
Mar 2021
#39
"Talking points": The gun-control version of "Widespread voting fraud"
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2021
#40
Yup. Because, you see there's this funny thing where the party in power gets to do shit
krispos42
Mar 2021
#52
You've declared "No more compromise" and "take 'em all, and round up the people that don't comply"..
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2021
#24