Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)EU talks on banning deadliest semi-automatic weapons hit deadlock [View all]
Source: Reuters
WORLD NEWS | Tue Dec 6, 2016 | 1:30pm EST
EU talks on banning deadliest semi-automatic weapons hit deadlock
Talks on an EU-wide ban on some of the most lethal semi-automatic assault weapons, including the Kalashnikov prized by militants the world over, broke down on Tuesday amid disputes over definitions of firearm types.
The executive European Commission is at odds with member states and the European Parliament over its plan to prohibit private citizens from owning weapons like the Russian-made Kalashnikov, or AK-47, and the U.S.-produced M-16.
The measure is part of an overall tightening of EU rules governing the purchase and sale of such weapons since two Islamist gunmen shot dead 11 people in the offices of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in January 2015 and militants killed 130 people in attacks in Paris in November last year.
Nearly seven hours of negotiations on the proposal broke off in Tuesday's pre-dawn hours amid wrangling over the legal definition of semi-automatic firearms, EU sources said.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
EU talks on banning deadliest semi-automatic weapons hit deadlock
Talks on an EU-wide ban on some of the most lethal semi-automatic assault weapons, including the Kalashnikov prized by militants the world over, broke down on Tuesday amid disputes over definitions of firearm types.
The executive European Commission is at odds with member states and the European Parliament over its plan to prohibit private citizens from owning weapons like the Russian-made Kalashnikov, or AK-47, and the U.S.-produced M-16.
The measure is part of an overall tightening of EU rules governing the purchase and sale of such weapons since two Islamist gunmen shot dead 11 people in the offices of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in January 2015 and militants killed 130 people in attacks in Paris in November last year.
Nearly seven hours of negotiations on the proposal broke off in Tuesday's pre-dawn hours amid wrangling over the legal definition of semi-automatic firearms, EU sources said.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-attacks-guns-idUSKBN13V2EF
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's the problem with trying to regulate by minutia; make a definition and the seller will
flamin lib
Dec 2016
#2
Hmm. One of the first after-market banana mags was fitted to a Rem Model 8, whose
Eleanors38
Dec 2016
#8
According to Heller the 2nd doesn't cover carrying any gun for any reason anywhere.
flamin lib
Dec 2016
#13
Advocating bans on 75% of civilian guns...bans that Canada and most of Europe have rejected...
benEzra
Dec 2016
#25
Yes, I realize that. That's why I said "75% of civilian guns" above, which would encompass
benEzra
Dec 2016
#43
That is the most stupid reply I've read in a long time. Not saying you are stupid, just your reply.
flamin lib
Dec 2016
#36
We'll also retain the right to own detachable-magazine semiautos, like Canadians and Europeans. n/t
benEzra
Dec 2016
#45
"I give up." I rather doubt that- those that seek to punish 'sinful' behavior for 'the greater good'
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2016
#46
That means I do not have an inherent right to carry an AK in a candy store filled with hyper kids
derby378
Dec 2016
#49
Heh. "Legal definitions." Well, what do you know. They're catching up -- overseas.
Eleanors38
Dec 2016
#7
Heh. If laws only existed because of ther deterrent effect, we wouldn't have ANY laws...
Eleanors38
Dec 2016
#34
No more confused or factually incorrect than certain self-proclaimed "experts" on this thread...
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2016
#47