Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: MSNBC gun carry poll. [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)25. You just can't quit, can you.
That is one of the stupidest interpretations of the accuracy of internet polling I've ever read. No surprise to me it comes from you.
Misrepresenting what I said, I mean. When I said "the result isn't 'bogus', its a reflection of the sad reality of the side of the issue that you are on", I wasn't referring to the poll result. I was referring to the result of one group having more intensity than another. The astute reader will notice and take into context, the words at the very beginning of my sentence: "In general". To the honest (and the literate), the words "in general" denote quite a different meaning than "when it comes to internet polls":
In general, if one group has more intensity...
Misrepresentation Fail.
Here you are indeed defending the bogus poll, the junk science garbage which you posted in an OP.
Now I can justifiably lump you in with sarisatka, the odd named 'just reading posts', & teddyR, as making fools of yourselves by defending this unscientific concealed carry internet gun poll.
(Note: Not to infer I didn't think you a fool previously.)
Now I can justifiably lump you in with sarisatka, the odd named 'just reading posts', & teddyR, as making fools of yourselves by defending this unscientific concealed carry internet gun poll.
(Note: Not to infer I didn't think you a fool previously.)
Here, NO I AM NOT. When I said "I can see how you'd prefer to characterize it as 'bogus' though to preserve the illusion", the key word was "it". Using the word "It", I was referring to the result of one group having more intensity than another, and the things that leads to. It isn't bogus, even though you hate it.
As pathetic from you as usual. Try to bedazzle readers with irrational BS rather than any reasoned argument.
Now I can even remove the word 'apparently' - which disproves your claim in itself - since you have now defended the bogus poll by your comment just above, denying it as bogus. You are indeed glowing over fraudulent poll results.
Now I can even remove the word 'apparently' - which disproves your claim in itself - since you have now defended the bogus poll by your comment just above, denying it as bogus. You are indeed glowing over fraudulent poll results.
Please take 'Introduction to Beginning Reading Comprehension' and get back to me.
Getting under your skin am I? good, it's nice to see truth twisting con artists (like donald trump) squirm away while attempting to extricate themselves from their own stupidity.
Squirm away? ROFL. I'm not the one that made a regular habit of hiding my responses to individual posts in generic thread replies which don't show up to the person you're responding to.
You are not capable of making me squirm away. My will is stronger than yours.
Did you even read what other posters said after I checked you?
I'm not sure you should give advice about reading, given the problems I've demonstrated that you have in that department.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just more proof that we need to repeal the 2A and confiscate every gun in civilian hands.
LonePirate
Jul 2016
#1
Well, you get right on that. Be sure to keep us updated with your progress!
Just reading posts
Jul 2016
#6