Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
23. A poor argument.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 03:24 PM
Jun 2016
And please do not tell me about "Joe the farmer who lives 300 miles from town and the police would take 6 hours to get to his house" because that type of example is statistically nearly non-existent.


A poor argument. America isn't just 1 big metro area. Many millions of people live rurally in areas that become inaccessible after an hours rain, or in rural counties with no budget for the presence of law enforcement in such quantities and in such a dispersal pattern, that the police are only 5 minutes away. I suggest You spend some time travelling and actually getting to know America before the next time you decide to talk authoritatively about it.

Mass shootings are statistically nearly non-existent, far more so than the rural living individual who may be an hour or more from law enforcement at times.

This does not seem to have been any impediment for any anti-gun posters "telling" the rest of us (who didn't do it) what for...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Anything to sell more weapons? guillaumeb Jun 2016 #1
Except that that firearms deaths are... Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #5
And gun homicides are higher in households that own guns. guillaumeb Jun 2016 #11
that is based on a study that failed peer review gejohnston Jun 2016 #14
I leave the decision of arming for SD up to responsible adults. You agree? Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #10
No. Ths is not a frontier state with no infrastructure. guillaumeb Jun 2016 #12
those infrastructures existed in the "old west" gejohnston Jun 2016 #15
So all of these gun massacres that keep occurring guillaumeb Jun 2016 #17
you didn't read what the research said gejohnston Jun 2016 #19
A poor argument. beevul Jun 2016 #23
In order:. To protect us from foreign invaders; to gather evidence of crime and apprehend suspects; Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #18
Good for them. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #2
I'm personally for strict gun control but I have no problem with this. Laffy Kat Jun 2016 #3
it isn't so much them having to now more than before, gejohnston Jun 2016 #4
Oh! So cute... sanatanadharma Jun 2016 #6
I don't believe this group is called TeddyR Jun 2016 #7
I got a "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously" vibe from the post you're replying to... friendly_iconoclast Jun 2016 #9
I believe that is an unpublished Phillip K. Dick novel. Sure of it. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author friendly_iconoclast Jun 2016 #8
"Bring back?" The government never controlled arms manufacturing with Springfield... Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #13
Soooo... Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #20
pink-washing the murder industry mwrguy Jun 2016 #21
So you prefer that the LGBT community not have that choice? DonP Jun 2016 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Pink Pistols: LGBT Gun Ow...»Reply #23