Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

hlthe2b

(107,408 posts)

1. Seatbelts do not prevent ALL motor vehicle deaths either...

Reply to Duckhunter935 (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:33 AM

Jun 2016

but why is it that--only with firearms-- we must show that ANY change to gun laws MUST, NECESSARILY, prevent ALL gun-related mass murders/atrocities?

It is waaay past time that we move past this blatant ploy promoted by NRA, that, unfortunately has been so successful (until NOW) in bamboozling the public with respect to even the smallest and most logical measures to control gun access.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Cross post from GD [View all] Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 OP

Seatbelts do not prevent ALL motor vehicle deaths either... hlthe2b Jun 2016 #1

Never said all, please do not put words in my mouth Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #2

It is a distinction without a difference... It is setting an impossible standard hlthe2b Jun 2016 #4

It is a large difference, words matter Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #6

"Any" and "all" is a "distinction without a difference"? Straw Man Jun 2016 #14

The very King's English is an NRA TalkingPoint©. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #16

I should have known Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #17

Don't expect much from them and you'll never be disappointed. DonP Jun 2016 #18

True nt Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #19

It's hard to discuss without complete information. JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #3

Apparently not Orlando Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #5

Hmmm?? JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #9

it would have, maybe, impacted the means gejohnston Jun 2016 #7

.... and when they do buy full autos from the local dealer ... DonP Jun 2016 #15

The whole point isn't preventing anything...it's to lead to a total ban. ileus Jun 2016 #8

I'm in agreement with your post... Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #10

The 2 sides of my coin on the UBC issue discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #11

what I have to say, this guy says it better gejohnston Jun 2016 #12

+ infinity discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #13

Outstanding, Mr. Johnston. pablo_marmol Jun 2016 #21

Except for collection of guns, which will never happen, nothing will stop mass shooters. Nt Logical Jun 2016 #20