13-year-old SC boy shoots and kills intruder while home alone

[beardown]

41. Brutality is what you are doing to logic to justify your position

"Brown had been previously convicted of unlawful carrying of a weapon, disorderly conduct, trespassing, and six felony charges related to drugs. Bennett was convicted of manufacturing and distributing a controlled substance, assault with intent to kill, pointing a firearm at a person,..."

So Brown had a conviction of an unlawful weapon. What kind of weapon could he have that would NOT be brutal if he used it, perhaps as part of his trespassing, disorderly conduct, or felony drug charges? Please tell. Also, he was breaking in with Bennett who had assault with intent to kill and pointing a firearm convictions. Once again, please tell me how Bennett did not use brutality during his assault TO KILL act which led to a conviction and how he might have used the firearm he pointed in a non-brutal method.

Senseless killing? No. The 13 year old getting murdered would have been senseless. There is a world of sense to killing someone while defending yourself in your own home from two men with weapon's convictions and one with an assault to kill (but without brutality of course).

I'm concerned with the kid's emotional state after being forced to kill to defend himself. You're concerned with your hatred of guns even to the point of defending two guys caught in the act of a home invasion carrying a gun and using that gun.