Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Silicosys4

(26 posts)
17. I can easily disagree.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 07:12 PM
Oct 2015

I earn a living as a glass blower, and I consider myself as an artist. I even have an Arts degree, as well as one in science. I have considerable experience in the vocal arts, having sung in college level choirs extensively.
I do consider myself to be an artistic person, and my parents, particularly my mother, helped to actively encourage an interest in whatever artistic endeavors that interested me.
I also have a considerable gun collection, which was another hobby that my parents introduced me to and encouraged me to pursue if it interested me.

I find this position taken by the author, that firearms and an appreciation for and practice of arts are mutually exclusive, to be naive and smacks of an assumed air of superiority.

Firearms in themselves can be a work of art, if made with extreme attention to detail, innovation, and execution. Many artists, myself included, wish they were in the same artistic league as a finely engraved custom European shotgun or double rifle, which can easily exceed $100k. I wish I could command that kind of price for my work, and those guns are worth it.

So no, art and guns aren't mutually exclusive.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The Creative Community Ta...»Reply #17